DJ Earworm

I've lately been jamming to some of these songs, they're all by Dj Earworm and are pretty insane.

*All by DJ Earworm

Publishing vs eBooks

As time progresses, new companies will come about and more will break down, there will be new people in the industry too but less jobs. There will also so less jobs which get paid a large sum and books will become cheeper.

Publishers get up to 80% of money made per book (minus other costs such as printing) In the end they are lucky if they get 10-15% after these costs are taken off. There is a huge risk that a book won't return all the money that was put into it. Harry potter 7 was of 8% book revenues that year (an example of a very successful book).

In 2008 US sold $24.2 billion books. There is now not much focus on book sales anymore but everyone is now interested in e books instead. For the average author: gets about $3000 if he sells 5000 books and even more shocking is that only 5% of books break even.

At the moment the publishing industry isn't doing too well indeed. The eBook sales have topped the hard copy sales and the gap is increasing. The Kindle, iPad 2 and the Nook are all out competing and selling better than their opponents, the publishers. Also 'Print on Demand' and 'Accessible Publishing' have been flourishing recently as they are a much better concept. Print on Demand  is a setup that allows the publisher to know when someone buys their book so that they can print of a new one instead of printing thousands in one go hoping that they will sell. Accessible Printing is a way of helping those with reading disabilities by making the font bigger or changing the font colour, they do this by making various copies online.

Unfortunately for publishers, the numbers aren't working their way. EBooks are selling more and more digital copies of books than the publishers are. They are selling more because they appeal in more ways than the hard copies, for example you only one device to bring thousands of books wherever you want. 

However, this rise in sales could have the opposite effect. Because the books are made digitally, they are open to piracy. The 'pirates' could drive the authors out if business because they are giving them away for free. This could revert the figures. 

Unfortunately though I do not think that that will happen as we live in an age where huge breakthroughs like this are followed up with improvements and sooner or later the piracy of books will be stopped.

Old Posts

Hey everyone, sorry about not being able to read the last few posts because they are in white and so is the background. If you highlight them you can read them.

Digital Rights Management

Right, this may seem like a bit of a mouthful to begin with but it really isn't! Digital Rights Management, or DRM for short, is a way of protecting something you own digitally, such as software or information, from being downloaded legally. It stops people from stealing or taking information online. In America in 1998 the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA) was passed through Congress and the Act is still in place nowadays along with many other laws on DRM. These laws mean that if you are caught downloading something that is protected you will face a judge. Companies such as Microsoft, Apple, Amazon and Sony all use DRM to protect their ideas and products from illegal downloading online.

The Debate:

Since DRM was created and its various laws, their has been a heated debate about if it should stay. Companies say that DRM is necessary to fight copyright infringement online and also keep users safe from computer viruses that could be added onto downloaded items. Also DRM helps the copyright holder maintain artistic integrity or ensure continued revenue streams. The people who don't like DRM say that there is no evidence that DRM helps prevent copyright infringement or computer viruses from spreading. They also say that DRM helps big business stifle innovation and competition, because they want to create something similar but is not the same as what is protected. Others say that DRMs are restricting creativity because people are not allowed to edit old things, they also say that future laws should ban DRMs.

Activists are always campaigning for change and recently Cory Doctorow, a blogger, writer, journalist and activist spoke to the BBC about DRM. He said: "The one thing that everyone should have uppermost in your mind when you're designing your business is that computers are never going to get worse at copying things." He believes that DRM should be abolished as it will help companies and it will encourage creativity, and down-loaders will not break the law because it is not illegal.

Games

Games have been around for countless years, ranging from the simple hop-scotch to the more complicated games such as Call of Duty. But recently digital games have had a huge boom in sales. Digital games are probably the best type of game there is, there is no way of getting physically hurt and it is not real life so it doesn't matter what you do.

Unfortunately, some people do no like digital games at all. Some say it is too unlike real life so it is useless and others say that it turns the players into 'mindless zombies'. Studies have also shown that on violent games, you are less prone to help someone out. However, I think that games are great. They teach you valuable tips for life and you have lots of fun.


Recently in the news 6 start-up games industry firms have secured funding in the first round of a £5m investment project run by Abertay University. The funding will allow companies to hire people with talent for game designing to work there. It will create around 400 jobs and create around 30 jobs. For more information go to: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-tayside-central-13050045


Some games I would recommend are: All Mario games, most Call of Duty games, and Medieval Total War II. I also think that the XBox 360 is the best console although others thinks differently.

Mashups and Remixes

Here are some mashups and remixes...

Enjoy!

The Great Fire of London 1666

The Great Fire of London is described as both a catastrophe and a revolutioniser. It was a catastrophe because it destroyed hald the city and it was a revolutioniser because the city could be rebuilt out of stone. But what happened to cause all of this. First we need to know some background. The King at the time was Charles the Second and also the Plague was devastating the city killing thousands every day.

The Story...

At 1:05 am on Sunday the 2nd of September one of Thomas Farriner's ovens was left still with a fire in it. The flames caught hold and eventually spread throughout the whole bakery. This event started the Great Fire of London. His Maid called Jane was the first to die out of the tousands to die in the next 2 days.

Here is a recreation of what happened in his oven...

And unfortunately this is what happened afterwards...



The aftermath



From the intial burning of the bakery a full scale destruction of everything began...

Once the Government had heard that the whole of London was ablaze they decided that they must blame someone or they will be blamed. They decided to blame foreigners and they branded them as arsonists. They even told the army to hunt down any foreigners and put them in prison or kill them. They were blamed for starting the fire in teh bakery at Pudding Lane. Here is a picture of troops chasing foreigners.



Foreigners being chased



Some people who were going to church as normal...



Going to Church





But soon St Paul's Cathedral was on fire as well...



People running from fire



People at the time wondered why the church burned down. It was made of stone and the only reason it did burn down was because there was wooden scaffolding inside. Many people hid there and much jewellry was placed there for protection. But all the people there died and all teh belongings were destroyed.

But it wasn't all bad... The city could be rebuilt out of stone and with new layouts and bigger roads. Also the fire destroyed the last of the Plague which had killed thousands of normal people.

*Note people in the pictures are not real and no Lego people were hurt in the making of this presentation.